A Different Place

Kandahar & London

122 notes

Britain is to allow one of its intelligence agencies to monitor all phone calls, texts, emails and online activities in the country to help tackle crime and militant attacks, the Interior Ministry said on Sunday.
Stephen Mangan (via reuters)

Crazy. And very little fallout from the announcement. People seem to find it harder to care about digital privacy.

(via soupsoup)

1 note

Q: Would you ever be willing to negotiate with the TFG?

A: Yes, this is my expectation. The possibility of negotiating with the TFG is promising, but there are some preconditions that would make it possible for me to come to the negotiation table and solve our differences.

Q: What are these conditions?

A: There are various conditions, but the main ones are:
1. Foreign troops must withdraw from Somalia
2. The TFG must allow the building of a coalition government in which each and every Somali participates to elect their choice of leader
3. The constitution of Somalia must be based on Islamic Sharia law

Hmm. I wonder where I’ve heard that before. This is actually from an interview with al-Shabab figure Sheikh Mukhtar Robow published in Somalia Report.

Filed under Somalia al-Shabab

0 notes

But the details in the autopsy reports show that Al Amri was found dead by hanging with his hands tied behind his back, calling into question whether he had actually killed himself.
Taken from this piece at ‘The Public Record’. For some context on those Guantánamo suicides, go read this and this.

26 notes

thepoliticalnotebook:

Cool New Project Alert: Last week Thesigers and Co. (the research and advisory firm connected with Current Intelligence, where I am a staff editor) announced the launch of a great project in need of funding. The Taliban Sources Project is “a major initiative to  preserve an unprecedented collection of original Taliban print and audio materials.”  These are materials gathered by researchers Alex Strick Van Linschoten, Felix Kuehn and Anand Gopal during the years they have spent working in Afghanistan.
According to the press release, the body of work that would need archiving and translation work to be made publicly available to be included in the discussion of the Taliban and their history includes:

…. more than 1.5 million words worth of Pashto-language text. Their initial inventory includes poetry, maps, night letters, press releases, transcripts of radio broadcasts, memoirs, and 10 volumes of Taliban laws and edicts. It also contains full runs of dozens of official Taliban newspapers and magazines published between 1996-2001, when the Taliban were the ruling power in Afghanistan.

Very excited to see this project come to fruition. If anybody out there is interesting in funding the work that will go into this, get in touch with any of the three researchers. I’ve linked to their websites above.
Image: 11 Dec. 2011. Taliban militants take part in a training session in Pakistan’s South Waziristan. Ishtiaq Mahsud/AP.
[Press Release]

thepoliticalnotebook:

Cool New Project Alert: Last week Thesigers and Co. (the research and advisory firm connected with Current Intelligence, where I am a staff editor) announced the launch of a great project in need of funding. The Taliban Sources Project is “a major initiative to  preserve an unprecedented collection of original Taliban print and audio materials.”  These are materials gathered by researchers Alex Strick Van Linschoten, Felix Kuehn and Anand Gopal during the years they have spent working in Afghanistan.

According to the press release, the body of work that would need archiving and translation work to be made publicly available to be included in the discussion of the Taliban and their history includes:

…. more than 1.5 million words worth of Pashto-language text. Their initial inventory includes poetry, maps, night letters, press releases, transcripts of radio broadcasts, memoirs, and 10 volumes of Taliban laws and edicts. It also contains full runs of dozens of official Taliban newspapers and magazines published between 1996-2001, when the Taliban were the ruling power in Afghanistan.

Very excited to see this project come to fruition. If anybody out there is interesting in funding the work that will go into this, get in touch with any of the three researchers. I’ve linked to their websites above.

Image: 11 Dec. 2011. Taliban militants take part in a training session in Pakistan’s South Waziristan. Ishtiaq Mahsud/AP.

[Press Release]

2 notes

Thesigers, a London-based research and advisory firm, today announced the launch of the Taliban Sources Project, a major initiative to preserve an unprecedented collection of original Taliban print and audio materials.

Three researchers, Alex Strick van Linschoten, Felix Kuehn, and Anand Gopal, acquired the materials while living and working in Afghanistan over a period of several years.

Strick van Linschoten and Kuehn are co-authors of the recently published book An Enemy We Created: The Myth of the Taliban/Al Qaeda Merger in Afghanistan,1970-2010 (Hurst Publishers, 2012). Gopal, a former Christian Science Monitor and Wall Street Journal correspondent, is currently working on a book for Henry Holt and Co. on the war in Afghanistan.

They estimate the collection contains more than 1.5 million words worth of Pashto-language text. Their initial inventory includes poetry, maps, night letters, press releases, transcripts of radio broadcasts, memoirs, and 10 volumes of Taliban laws and edicts. It also contains full runs of dozens of official Taliban newspapers and magazines published between 1996-2001, when the Taliban were the ruling power in Afghanistan.

Strick van Linschoten explained that he and Kuehn initially focused on documents that pre-dated 2001. Gopal contributed post-2001 sources. All told, the collection spans a period of over 30 years, 1979-2011.
Thesigers director Michael A. Innes explained the company’s involvement in the project. “Like many people who’ve followed the work of these writers, I was inspired,” Innes says. “They’re widely recognized not just for what they’ve written and published, but for the way they’ve chosen to do what they do, by immersing themselves in it, by living it and breathing it, despite the physical dangers involved.”

After corresponding for several years, Innes and Strick van Linschoten met in London mid-2011 to discuss the project over coffee. Strick van Linschoten, Kuehn, and Gopal had already been thinking about what to do with the materials they had acquired, but had grown increasingly frustrated in their search for financial support for their work.

For Innes, the initiative resonated. “I think anyone who’s done research toward a degree or for a book, and collected significant volumes of primary source materials in the process, has then been faced with the dilemma of what to do with it all afterwards. Throw it out? Donate it to a museum?” The sheer volume of documents in this case, Innes says, puts the collection in a league of of its own.

Strick van Linschoten makes the point that the materials are a unique intellectual resource. “I have not read a history of the Taliban movement that takes these documents into account,” he notes. “It should help inject some new life into discussion of the Taliban and Afghan history.”

Innes and Strick van Linschoten agreed that the collection should be made accessible to other researchers and to the public. Getting to that point meant thinking hard about what to do next. The collection is at risk of physical decay. That meant finding a host for it, ideally with the special collections department of a university or institute equipped with environmental controls and secure storage. The contents of the collection would need to be catalogued. Long term preservation would mean scanning and digitizing everything. Making it widely accessible would mean setting up a website and building a searchable online database. Everything would have to be translated from Pashto to English.

It also meant designing a project with multiple stakeholders in mind, including journalists, scholars, archivists, research ethicists, and diplomats. For Innes, convening an advisory board was a logical first step. “We’re now circulating a concept note to interested parties,” Innes says, “and working on securing institutional and financial support.”

Press release issued by Thesigers on the Taliban Sources Project

0 notes

To say “go” in the Tuvan language, for example, the speaker first must know the location and identity of the nearest river as well as the direction in which the water is flowing. “If you don’t know the river current, you can’t say the correct word for go,” Mr. Harrison said.
Quote of the week in a WSJ article about how digital repositories for languages could help stem the slow death that many look like they face in the coming century.

Filed under language

0 notes

From this proceeds his view of what the study and writing of history is — or should be — all about: telling the story, “reminding people that things actually happened,” and “[getting] it right: again and again and again.” It’s because they have lost sight of this essentially simple truth, and have been taught to value “large theoretical claims about the deconstructive purpose of the research” above getting it right, that academic historians “don’t know what they’re doing any more.” They have been seduced by the siren song of supposedly pure and beautiful “higher truths,” saving themselves from involvement in the “ugly and complicated” real world and, in the process, losing contact with the reading public.
I could keep quoting from this LA Review of Books essay all afternoon. Give it a read. Well worth your time.

2 notes

Though life caused him to lose patience with what he came to think of as “the cesspit of Theory” (the attempt to explain everything in terms of grand overarching intellectual constructs), he never stopped believing that there is such a thing as truth, that the truth of the historian is reached not through abstractions but through the collection and confirmation of facts, that that kind of truth matters in a big way, and that learning and telling the truth about the past is about the closest thing that the contemporary world has to a sacred responsibility.
LA Review of Books essay on Tony Judt’s final (?) work, published in recent days.